Impact of seismic demand on construction costs for buildings up to 8 storeys high
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.1673Abstract
The legally binding earthquake performance requirements in New Zealand's Building Act and Building Code emphasise building collapse prevention, allowing for a certain degree of damage to resist the seismic load. However, societal expectations demand that buildings remain operational after an earthquake. This research aims to understand the true cost of up to 8 storeys high building structures that remain operational after an earthquake. Our assumptions are: 1) higher seismic demand is expected to have a limited impact in overall construction costs, and quite minimal impact on total development costs, and 2) the influence of seismic resilience on construction costs is different depending on the structural system. An extensive construction costs database was developed including the most typical structural and foundation systems. The main conclusions are that 1) the effect of location and floor type on construction costs is not critical, 2) the impact of a higher seismic demand on construction costs depends on the structural system, and 3) foundation type has a large influence on construction costs but seismic demand does not. Engineers should prioritise stiff lateral systems because the cost implications of having a stiffer structural system are minimal, especially when considering the development costs. The cost implications of having more resilient buildings that can be readily occupied after an earthquake are negligible, and New Zealand should move towards stiff, damage resisting structures using well understood structural systems like RC walls. Society expects this from our buildings, our engineers are trained and capable to design them, and the extra cost is minuscule.
References
New Zealand Parliament (2004). Building Act. Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE), Wellington, New Zealand.
Department of Building and Housing - Te Tari Kaupapa Whare (2004). The New Zealand Building Code. New Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand.
MBIE (2019). “New Zealand Building Code: Clause B1 Structure - Acceptable Solutions and Verification Methods”. Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE) - Hikina Whakatutukī, Wellington, New Zealand.
NZS (2004). “NZS 1170-5: Structural Design Actions - Earthquake Actions”. Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
SEAOC (1995). “Performance Based Seismic Engineering”. Structural Engineering Association of California (SEAOC) - Vision 2000 Committee, Sacramento, California.
CERC (2012). Final Report. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission Wellington, New Zealand. https://canterbury.royalcommission.govt.nz/
Marquis F, Kim JJ, Kenneth JE and Chang SE (2017). “Understanding post-earthquake decisions on multi-storey concrete buildings in Christchurch, New Zealand”. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15(2): 731–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9772-8
Parker M and Steenkam D (2012). “The economic impact of the Canterbury earthquakes”. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, 75(3): 13.
Dorahy MJ and Lee K-D (2012). “Psychological distress following the 2010 Christchurch earthquake: A community assessment of two differentially affected suburbs”. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 17(3): 203–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2011.616737
Kuijer RG, Marshall ME and Bishop AN (2014). “Prospective predictors of short-term adjustment after the Canterbury earthquakes: Personality and depression.” Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 6(4): 361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034591
Casey R, Farvid P and Sibley CG (2014). “I laugh and say I have ‘Earthquake brain!’’’: Resident Responses to the September 2010 Christchurch Earthquake”. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 43(2): 4-13.
Dhakal RP (2011). “Structural Design for Earthquake Resistance: Past, Present and Future”. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission Report, Christchurch, NZ. https://canterbury.royalcommission.govt.nz/documents-by-key/2011-09-2753
Buchanan AH, Bull D, Dhakal RP, MacRae GA, Palermo A and Pampanin S (2011). “Base Isolation and Damage-Resistant Technologies for Improved Seismic Performance of Buildings”. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission Report, Christchurch, NZ. https://canterbury.royalcommission.govt.nz/documents-by-key/2011-09-2377/$file/ENG.ACA.0020.pdf
RP Dhakal (2024). “Seismic design of buildings: Where to next?”. Bulletin of the NZ Society for Earthquake Engineering, 57(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.1680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.1680
S Khakurel, RP Dhakal, T Yeow & S Saha, (2020). “Performance group weighting factors for rapid seismic loss estimation of buildings of different usage”. Earthquake Spectra, 36(3): 1141-1165. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019901311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019901311
Gerstenberger M et al. (2022). “New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model 2022 Revision: Model, Hazard and Process Overview”. GNS Science Report 2022/57, GNS Science. Lower Hutt, NZ, 106 pages. https://doi.org/10.21420/TB83-7X19
Amos S (2004). Skills and Knowledge of Cost Engineering: A Project of the Education Board of AACE International, 5th Edition. AACE International, Morgantown, WV, USA.
PMI (2016). Construction Extension to the PMBOK®Guide, 2nd Edition. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA, USA.
RICS (2012). “RICS New Rules of Measurement” in NRM 1, Order of Cost Estimating and Cost Planning for Capital Building Works. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London, UK.
Ashworth A and Perera S (2015). Cost Studies of Buildings, 6th Edition. Routledge: Abingdon Oxon, UK; New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315708867
Kirkham R and Brandon P (2007). Ferry and Brandon’s Cost Planning of Buildings. Blackwell: Oxford, UK; Malden, MA, USA.
Potts K (2008). Construction Cost Management: Learning from Case Studies. Taylor & Francis: London, UK; New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933015
Ashworth A (2008). Pre-Contract Studies: Development Economics, Tendering, and Estimating. Blackwell: Oxford, UK; Melden, MA, USA.
Nisbet R, Miner G and Yale K (2018). “The data mining and predictive analytic process”. pp. 39–54 in Handbook of Statistical Analysis and Data Mining Applications. Eds: Nisbet R, Miner G and Yale K. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416632-5.00003-7
Fellows R (2010). “New research paradigms in the built environment”. Construction Innovation, 10: 5–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14714171011017545
Brandon P (1982). “Building cost research: Need for a paradigm shift?” in Building Cost Techniques: New Directions. E&FN Spon: London, UK.
Egan J (1998). “Rethinking Construction”. Report of the Construction Task Force to the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, on the Scope for Improving the Quality and Efficiency of UK Construction. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, UK, 40 pages.
Koskela L (2020). “Theory of Lean Construction”. pp. 2–13 in Lean Construction. Eds: Tzortzopoulos P, Kagioglou M and Koskela L. Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429203732-1
Kim Y and Ballard G (2001). “Activity-based costing and its application to lean construction”. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Singapore, 6–8 August; pp. 6–8.
Ballard G (2008). “The lean project delivery system: An update”. Lean Construction Journal, 1: 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60164/73d8h1c5c
Zhao L (2018). “Building Development Cost Drivers in the New Zealand Construction Industry: A Multilevel Analysis of the Causal Relationships”. PhD Dissertation, Massey University, Albany, New Zealand.
Quotable Value Ltd. (2021). QV Cost Builder.
Rawlinsons Ltd. (2013). New Zealand Construction Handbook. Rawlinsons Publications, Auckland, NZ.
Dhakal RP and Aninthaneni P (2021). “Are stronger, stiffer buildings indeed costlier?: Case study of RC frame buildings”. Proceedings of the 2021 NZSEE Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Sullivan T (2020). “Post-earthquake reparability of buildings: The role of non-structural elements”. Structural Engineering International, 30(2): 217–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2020.1724525
Bhatta J, Dhakal RP and Sullivan TJ (2023). “Seismic performance of a rocking precast concrete cladding panel system under lateral cyclic displacement demands”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 27(4): 929-958. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2022.2033359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2022.2033359
Bhatta J, Dhakal RP and Sullivan TJ (2022). “Seismic evaluation of rocking internal partition walls with dual-slot track under quasi-static cyclic drifts”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 27(14): 4161-4181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2022.2162629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2022.2162629
Chan TK (2011). “Comparison of precast construction costs–case studies in Australia and Malaysia”. Proceedings of the 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September, Bristol, UK, pp. 3-12.
